 |
|
HOME :: PARANORMAL ::
SPIRITUALISM |
|
The Vital Message
By SIR ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE
CHAPTER
IV
THE
COMING WORLD
We come first to the
messages which tell us of the life
beyond the grave, sent by those who are actually living
it. I
have already insisted upon the fact that they have three
weighty
claims to our belief. The one is, that they are
accompanied by
"signs," in the Biblical sense, in the shape of "miracles"
or
phenomena. The second is, that in many cases they
are
accompanied by assertions about this life of ours which
prove to
be correct, and which are beyond the possible knowledge of
the
medium after every deduction has been made for telepathy
or for
unconscious memory. The third is, that they have a
remarkable,
though not a complete, similarity from whatever source
they come.
It may be noted that the differences of opinion become
most
marked when they deal with their own future, which may
well be a
matter of speculation to them as to us. Thus, upon
the
question of reincarnation there is a distinct cleavage,
and
though I am myself of opinion that the general evidence is
against this oriental doctrine, it is none the less an
undeniable
fact that it has been maintained by some messages which
appear in
other ways to be authentic, and, therefore, it is
necessary to
keep one's mind open on the subject.
Before entering upon the substance of the messages I
should
wish to emphasize the second of these two points, so as to
reinforce the reader's confidence in the authenticity of
these
assertions. To this end I will give a detailed
example, with
names almost exact. The medium was Mr. Phoenix, of
Glasgow, with
whom I have myself had some remarkable experiences.
The sitter
was Mr. Ernest Oaten, the President of the Northern
Spiritual
Union, a man of the utmost veracity and precision of
statement.
The dialogue, which came by the direct voice, a trumpet
acting as
megaphone, ran like this:--
The Voice: Good evening, Mr. Oaten.
Mr. O.: Good evening. Who are you?
The Voice: My name is Mill. You know my father.
Mr. O.: No, I don't remember anyone of the
name.
The Voice: Yes, you were speaking to him the other day.
Mr. O.: To be sure. I remember now.
I only met him
casually.
The Voice: I want you to give him a message from me.
Mr. O.: What is it?
The Voice: Tell him that he was not mistaken at midnight on
Tuesday last.
Mr. O.: Very good. I will say so.
Have you passed long?
The Voice: Some time. But our time is different from
yours.
Mr. O.: What were you?
The Voice: A Surgeon.
Mr. O.: How did you pass?
The Voice: Blown up in a battleship during the war.
Mr. O.: Anything more?
The answer was the Gipsy song from "Il Trovatore," very
accurately whistled, and then a quick-step. After
the latter,
the voice said: "That is a test for father."
This reproduction of conversation is not quite verbatim,
but
gives the condensed essence. Mr. Oaten at once
visited Mr. Mill,
who was not a Spiritualist, and found that every detail
was
correct. Young Mill had lost his life as narrated.
Mr. Mill,
senior, explained that while sitting in his study at
midnight on
the date named he had heard the Gipsy song from "Il
Trovatore,"
which had been a favourite of his boy's, and being unable
to
trace the origin of the music, had finally thought that it
was a
freak of his imagination. The test connected with
the quick-step
had reference to a tune which the young man used to play
upon the
piccolo, but which was so rapid that he never could get it
right,
for which he was chaffed by the family.
I tell this story at length to make the reader realise
that
when young Mill, and others like him, give such proofs of
accuracy, which we can test for ourselves, we are bound to
take
their assertions very seriously when they deal with the
life
they are actually leading, though in their very nature we
can
only check their accounts by comparison with others.
Now let me epitomise what these assertions are. They
say
that they are exceedingly happy, and that they do not wish
to
return. They are among the friends whom they had
loved and lost,
who meet them when they die and continue their careers
together.
They are very busy on all forms of congenial work.
The world in
which they find themselves is very much like that which
they have
quitted, but everything keyed to a higher octave. As
in a higher
octave the rhythm is the same, and the relation of notes
to each
other the same, but the total effect different, so it is
here.
Every earthly thing has its equivalent. Scoffers
have guffawed
over alcohol and tobacco, but if all things are reproduced
it
would be a flaw if these were not reproduced also.
That they
should be abused, as they are here, would, indeed, be evil
tidings, but nothing of the sort has been said, and in the
much
discussed passage in "Raymond," their production was
alluded to
as though it were an unusual, and in a way a humorous,
instance of the resources of the beyond. I wonder
how many of
the preachers, who have taken advantage of this passage in
order
to attack the whole new revelation, have remembered that
the only
other message which ever associated alcohol with the life
beyond
is that of Christ Himself, when He said: "I will not
drink
henceforth of this fruit of the vine until that day when I
drink
it new with you in my Father's kingdom."
This matter is a detail, however, and it is always
dangerous
to discuss details in a subject which is so enormous, so
dimly
seen. As the wisest woman I have known remarked to
me: "Things
may well be surprising over there, for if we had been told
the
facts of this life before we entered it, we should never
have
believed it." In its larger issues this happy life
to come
consists in the development of those gifts which we
possess.
There is action for the man of action, intellectual work
for the
thinker, artistic, literary, dramatic and religious for
those
whose God-given powers lie that way. What we have
both in brain
and character we carry over with us. No man is too
old to learn,
for what he learns he keeps. There is no physical
side to
love and no child-birth, though there is close union
between
those married people who really love each other, and,
generally,
there is deep sympathetic friendship and comradeship
between the
sexes. Every man or woman finds a soul mate sooner
or later.
The child grows up to the normal, so that the mother who
lost a
babe of two years old, and dies herself twenty years later
finds
a grown-up daughter of twenty-two awaiting her coming.
Age,
which is produced chiefly by the mechanical presence of
lime in
our arteries, disappears, and the individual reverts to
the full
normal growth and appearance of completed man--or
womanhood. Let
no woman mourn her lost beauty, and no man his lost
strength or
weakening brain. It all awaits them once more upon
the other
side. Nor is any deformity or bodily weakness there,
for all is
normal and at its best.
Before leaving this section of the subject, I should say a
few more words upon the evidence as it affects the etheric
body.
This body is a perfect thing. This is a matter of
consequence in
these days when so many of our heroes have been mutilated
in
the wars. One cannot mutilate the etheric body, and
it remains
always intact. The first words uttered by a
returning spirit in
the recent experience of Dr. Abraham Wallace were "I have
got my
left arm again." The same applies to all birth
marks,
deformities, blindness, and other imperfections.
None of them
are permanent, and all will vanish in that happier life
that
awaits us. Such is the teaching from the
beyond--that a perfect
body waits for each.
"But," says the critic, "what then of the clairvoyant
descriptions, or the visions where the aged father is
seen, clad
in the old-fashioned garments of another age, or the
grandmother
with crinoline and chignon? Are these the
habiliments of
heaven?" Such visions are not spirits, but they are
pictures
which are built up before us or shot by spirits into our
brains
or those of the seer for the purposes of recognition.
Hence the
grey hair and hence the ancient garb. When a real
spirit is
indeed seen it comes in another form to this, where the
flowing
robe, such as has always been traditionally ascribed to
the
angels, is a vital thing which, by its very colour and
texture, proclaims the spiritual condition of the wearer,
and is
probably a condensation of that aura which surrounds us
upon
earth.
It is a world of sympathy. Only those who have this
tie
foregather. The sullen husband, the flighty wife, is
no longer
there to plague the innocent spouse. All is sweet
and peaceful.
It is the long rest cure after the nerve strain of life,
and
before new experiences in the future. The
circumstances are
homely and familiar. Happy circles live in pleasant
homesteads
with every amenity of beauty and of music. Beautiful
gardens,
lovely flowers, green woods, pleasant lakes, domestic
pets--all
of these things are fully described in the messages of the
pioneer travellers who have at last got news back to those
who
loiter in the old dingy home. There are no poor and
no rich.
The craftsman may still pursue his craft, but he does it
for the
joy of his work. Each serves the community as best
he can, while
from above come higher ministers of grace, the "Angels" of
holy
writ, to direct and help. Above all, shedding down
His
atmosphere upon all, broods that great Christ spirit, the
very soul of reason, of justice, and of sympathetic
understanding, who has the earth sphere, with all its
circles,
under His very special care. It is a place of joy
and laughter.
There are games and sports of all sorts, though none which
cause
pain to lower life. Food and drink in the grosser
sense do not
exist, but there seem to be pleasures of taste, and this
distinction causes some confusion in the messages upon the
point.
But above all, brain, energy, character, driving power, if
exerted for good, makes a man a leader there as here,
while
unselfishness, patience and spirituality there, as here,
qualify
the soul for the higher places, which have often been won
by
those very tribulations down here which seem so
purposeless and
so cruel, and are in truth our chances of spiritual
quickening
and promotion, without which life would have been barren
and
without profit.
The revelation abolishes the idea of a grotesque hell and
of
a fantastic heaven, while it substitutes the conception of
a
gradual rise in the scale of existence without any
monstrous
change which would turn us in an instant from man to angel
or
devil. The system, though different from previous
ideas,
does not, as it seems to me, run counter in any radical
fashion
to the old beliefs. In ancient maps it was usual for
the
cartographer to mark blank spaces for the unexplored
regions,
with some such legend as "here are anthropophagi," or
"here are
mandrakes," scrawled across them. So in our theology
there have
been ill-defined areas which have admittedly been left
unfilled,
for what sane man has ever believed in such a heaven as is
depicted in our hymn books, a land of musical idleness and
barren
monotonous adoration! Thus in furnishing a clearer
conception
this new system has nothing to supplant. It paints
upon a blank
sheet.
One may well ask, however, granting that there is evidence
for such a life and such a world as has been described,
what
about those who have not merited such a destination?
What do the
messages from beyond say about these? And here one
cannot be too
definite, for there is no use exchanging one dogma for
another.
One can but give the general purport of such information
as has
been vouchsafed to us. It is natural that those with
whom we
come in contact are those whom we may truly call the
blessed, for
if the thing be approached in a reverent and religious
spirit it
is those whom we should naturally attract. That
there are many
less fortunate than themselves is evident from their own
constant
allusions to that regenerating and elevating missionary
work
which is among their own functions. They descend
apparently and
help others to gain that degree of spirituality which fits
them
for this upper sphere, as a higher student might descend
to a
lower class in order to bring forward a backward pupil.
Such a
conception gives point to Christ's remark that there was
more joy
in heaven over saving one sinner than over ninety-nine
just, for
if He had spoken of an earthly sinner he would surely have
had to
become just in this life and so ceased to be a sinner
before he
had reached Paradise. It would apply very exactly,
however, to a
sinner rescued from a lower sphere and brought to a higher
one.
When we view sin in the light of modern science, with the
tenderness of the modern conscience and with a sense of
justice
and proportion, it ceases to be that monstrous cloud which
darkened the whole vision of the mediaeval theologian.
Man has
been more harsh with himself than an all-merciful God will
ever
be. It is true that with all deductions there
remains a great
residuum which means want of individual effort, conscious
weakness of will, and culpable failure of character when
the
sinner, like Horace, sees and applauds the higher while he
follows the lower. But when, on the other hand, one
has made
allowances--and can our human allowance be as generous as
God's?--for the sins which are the inevitable product of
early
environment, for the sins which are due to hereditary and
inborn
taint, and to the sins which are due to clear physical
causes,
then the total of active sin is greatly reduced.
Could one, for
example, imagine that Providence, all-wise and
all-merciful, as
every creed proclaims, could punish the unfortunate wretch
who
hatches criminal thoughts behind the slanting brows of a
criminal
head? A doctor has but to glance at the cranium to
predicate the
crime. In its worst forms all crime, from Nero to
Jack the
Ripper, is the product of absolute lunacy, and those gross
national sins to which allusion has been made seem to
point to
collective national insanity. Surely, then, there is
hope that
no very terrible inferno is needed to further punish those
who
have been so afflicted upon earth. Some of our dead
have
remarked that nothing has surprised them so much as to
find who
have been chosen for honour, and certainly, without in any
way
condoning sin, one could well imagine that the man whose
organic
makeup predisposed him with irresistible force in that
direction
should, in justice, receive condolence and sympathy.
Possibly
such a sinner, if he had not sinned so deeply as he might
have
done, stands higher than the man who was born good, and
remained
so, but was no better at the end of his life. The
one has made
some progress and the other has not. But the
commonest failing,
the one which fills the spiritual hospitals of the other
world,
and is a temporary bar to the normal happiness of the
after-life,
is the sin of Tomlinson in Kipling's poem, the commonest
of all
sins in respectable British circles, the sin of
conventionality,
of want of conscious effort and development, of a sluggish
spirituality, fatted over by a complacent mind and by the
comforts of life. It is the man who is satisfied,
the man who
refers his salvation to some church or higher power
without
steady travail of his own soul, who is in deadly danger.
All
churches are good, Christian or non-Christian, so long as
they
promote the actual spirit life of the individual, but all
are
noxious the instant that they allow him to think that by
any form
of ceremony, or by any fashion of creed, he obtains the
least
advantage over his neighbour, or can in any way dispense
with
that personal effort which is the only road to the higher
places.
This is, of course, as applicable to believers in
Spiritualism as
to any other belief. If it does not show in practice
then it is
vain. One can get through this life very comfortably
following
without question in some procession with a venerable
leader. But
one does not die in a procession. One dies alone.
And it is
then that one has alone to accept the level gained by the
work of
life.
And what is the punishment of the undeveloped soul?
It is
that it should be placed where it WILL develop, and sorrow
would seem always to be the forcing ground of souls.
That
surely is our own experience in life where the
insufferably
complacent and unsympathetic person softens and mellows
into
beauty of character and charity of thought, when tried
long
enough and high enough in the fires of life. The
Bible has
talked about the "Outer darkness where there is weeping
and
gnashing of teeth." The influence of the Bible has
sometimes
been an evil one through our own habit of reading a book
of
Oriental poetry and treating it as literally as if it were
Occidental prose. When an Eastern describes a herd
of a thousand
camels he talks of camels which are more numerous than the
hairs
of your head or the stars in the sky. In this spirit
of
allowance for Eastern expression, one must approach those
lurid
and terrible descriptions which have darkened the lives of
so
many imaginative children and sent so many earnest adults
into
asylums. From all that we learn there are indeed
places of outer
darkness, but dim as these uncomfortable waiting-rooms may
be,
they all admit to heaven in the end. That is the
final
destination of the human race, and it would indeed be a
reproach to the Almighty if it were not so. We
cannot dogmatise
upon this subject of the penal spheres, and yet we have
very
clear teaching that they are there and that the
no-man's-land
which separates us from the normal heaven, that third
heaven to
which St. Paul seems to have been wafted in one short
strange
experience of his lifetime, is a place which corresponds
with the
Astral plane of the mystics and with the "outer darkness"
of the
Bible. Here linger those earth-bound spirits whose
worldly
interests have clogged them and weighed them down, until
every
spiritual impulse had vanished; the man whose life has
been
centred on money, on worldly ambition, or on sensual
indulgence.
The one-idea'd man will surely be there, if his one idea
was not
a spiritual one. Nor is it necessary that he should
be an evil
man, if dear old brother John of Glastonbury, who loved
the great
Abbey so that he could never detach himself from it, is to
be
classed among earth-bound spirits. In the most
material and
pronounced classes of these are the ghosts who impinge
very
closely upon matter and have been seen so often by those
who
have no strong psychic sense. It is probable, from
what we
know of the material laws which govern such matters, that
a ghost
could never manifest itself if it were alone, that the
substance
for the manifestation is drawn from the spectator, and
that the
coldness, raising of hair, and other symptoms of which he
complains are caused largely by the sudden drain upon his
own
vitality. This, however, is to wander into
speculation, and far
from that correlation of psychic knowledge with religion,
which
has been the aim of these chapters.
By one of those strange coincidences, which seem to me
sometimes to be more than coincidences, I had reached this
point
in my explanation of the difficult question of the
intermediate
state, and was myself desiring further enlightenment, when
an old
book reached me through the post, sent by someone whom I
have
never met, and in it is the following passage, written by
an
automatic writer, and in existence since 1880. It
makes the
matter plain, endorsing what has been said and adding new
points.
"Some cannot advance further than the borderland--such as
never
thought of spirit life and have lived entirely for the
earth, its cares and pleasures--even clever men and
women, who
have lived simply intellectual lives without spirituality.
There
are many who have misused their opportunities, and are now
longing for the time misspent and wishing to recall the
earth-
life. They will learn that on this side the time can
be
redeemed, though at much cost. The borderland has
many among the
restless money-getters of earth, who still haunt the
places where
they had their hopes and joys. These are often the
longest to
remain . . . many are not unhappy. They feel the
relief to be
sufficient to be without their earth bodies. All
pass through
the borderland, but some hardly perceive it. It is
so immediate,
and there is no resting there for them. They pass on
at once to
the refreshment place of which we tell you." The
anonymous
author, after recording this spirit message, mentions the
interesting fact that there is a Christian inscription in
the
Catacombs which runs: NICEFORUS ANIMA DULCIS IN
REFRIGERIO,
"Nicephorus, a sweet soul in the refreshment place."
One more
scrap of evidence that the early Christian scheme of
things
was very like that of the modern psychic.
So much for the borderland, the intermediate condition.
The
present Christian dogma has no name for it, unless it be
that
nebulous limbo which is occasionally mentioned, and is
usually
defined as the place where the souls of the just who died
before
Christ were detained. The idea of crossing a space
before
reaching a permanent state on the other side is common to
many
religions, and took the allegorical form of a river with a
ferry-
boat among the Romans and Greeks. Continually, one
comes on
points which make one realise that far back in the world's
history there has been a true revelation, which has been
blurred
and twisted in time. Thus in Dr. Muir's summary of
the RIG.
VEDA, he says, epitomising the beliefs of the first Aryan
conquerors of India: "Before, however, the unborn
part" (that
is, the etheric body) "can complete its course to the
third
heaven it has to traverse a vast gulf of darkness, leaving
behind
on earth all that is evil, and proceeding by the paths the
fathers trod, the spirit soars to the realms of eternal
light,
recovers there his body in a glorified form, and obtains
from God a delectable abode and enters upon a more perfect
life,
which is crowned with the fulfilment of all desires, is
passed in the presence of the Gods and employed in the
fulfilment
of their pleasure." If we substitute "angels" for
"Gods" we must
admit that the new revelation from modern spirit sources
has much
in common with the belief of our Aryan fathers.
Such, in very condensed form, is the world which is
revealed
to us by these wonderful messages from the beyond.
Is it an
unreasonable vision? Is it in any way opposed to
just
principles? Is it not rather so reasonable that
having got the
clue we could now see that, given any life at all, this is
exactly the line upon which we should expect to move?
Nature and
evolution are averse from sudden disconnected
developments. If a
human being has technical, literary, musical, or other
tendencies, they are an essential part of his character,
and to
survive without them would be to lose his identity and to
become
an entirely different man. They must therefore
survive death if
personality is to be maintained. But it is no use
their
surviving unless they can find means of expression, and
means of
expression seem to require certain material agents, and
also a
discriminating audience. So also the sense of
modesty among
civilised races has become part of our very selves, and
implies
some covering of our forms if personality is to continue.
Our
desires and sympathies would prompt us to live with those
we
love, which implies something in the nature of a house,
while the
human need for mental rest and privacy would predicate the
existence of separate rooms. Thus, merely starting
from the
basis of the continuity of personality one might, even
without
the revelation from the beyond, have built up some such
system by the use of pure reason and deduction.
So far as the existence of this land of happiness goes, it
would seem to have been more fully proved than any other
religious conception within our knowledge.
It may very reasonably be asked, how far this precise
description of life beyond the grave is my own conception,
and
how far it has been accepted by the greater minds who have
studied this subject? I would answer, that it is my
own
conclusion as gathered from a very large amount of
existing
testimony, and that in its main lines it has for many
years been
accepted by those great numbers of silent active workers
all over
the world, who look upon this matter from a strictly
religious
point of view. I think that the evidence amply
justifies us in
this belief. On the other hand, those who have
approached this
subject with cold and cautious scientific brains, endowed,
in
many cases, with the strongest prejudices against dogmatic
creeds
and with very natural fears about the possible re-growth
of
theological quarrels, have in most cases stopped short of
a
complete acceptance, declaring that there can be no
positive
proof upon such matters, and that we may deceive ourselves
either
by a reflection of our own thoughts or by receiving the
impressions of the medium. Professor Zollner, for
example, says:
"Science can make no use of the substance of intellectual
revelations, but must be guided by observed facts and by
the
conclusions logically and mathematically uniting them"--a
passage
which is quoted with approval by Professor Reichel, and
would
seem to be endorsed by the silence concerning the
religious
side of the question which is observed by most of our
great
scientific supporters. It is a point of view which
can well be
understood, and yet, closely examined, it would appear to
be a
species of enlarged materialism. To admit, as these
observers
do, that spirits do return, that they give every proof of
being
the actual friends whom we have lost, and yet to turn a
deaf ear
to the messages which they send would seem to be pushing
caution
to the verge of unreason. To get so far, and yet not
to go
further, is impossible as a permanent position. If,
for example,
in Raymond's case we find so many allusions to the small
details
of his home upon earth, which prove to be surprisingly
correct,
is it reasonable to put a blue pencil through all he says
of the
home which he actually inhabits? Long before I had
convinced my
mind of the truth of things which appeared so grotesque
and
incredible, I had a long account sent by table tilting
about the
conditions of life beyond. The details seemed to me
impossible
and I set them aside, and yet they harmonise, as I now
discover,
with other revelations. So, too, with the automatic
script
of Mr. Hubert Wales, which has been described in my
previous
book. He had tossed it aside into a drawer as being
unworthy of
serious consideration, and yet it also proved to be in
harmony.
In neither of these cases was telepathy or the
prepossession of
the medium a possible explanation. On the whole, I
am inclined
to think that these doubtful or dissentient scientific
men,
having their own weighty studies to attend to, have
confined
their reading and thought to the more objective side of
the
question, and are not aware of the vast amount of
concurrent
evidence which appears to give us an exact picture of the
life
beyond. They despise documents which cannot be
proved, and they
do not, in my opinion, sufficiently realise that a general
agreement of testimony, and the already established
character of
a witness, are themselves arguments for truth. Some
complicate
the question by predicating the existence of a fourth
dimension
in that world, but the term is an absurdity, as are all
terms
which find no corresponding impression in the human brain.
We
have mysteries enough to solve without gratuitously
introducing fresh ones. When solid passes through
solid, it
is, surely, simpler to assume that it is done by a
dematerialisation, and subsequent reassembly--a process
which
can, at least, be imagined by the human mind--than to
invoke an
explanation which itself needs to be explained.
In the next and final chapter I will ask the reader to
accompany me in an examination of the New Testament by the
light
of this psychic knowledge, and to judge how far it makes
clear
and reasonable much which was obscure and confused.
|
Home | Alternative
Medicine | Astrology | Channeling
|
Divination |
Esoteric & Occult |
Food
|
Life
After Death | Michael
Teachings
| Mind
& Body | Paranormal
| Philosophy
& Religion |
Relationships
| Spiritual
Growth
| World
Issues
|
|
|